The Seestar S30 is the better choice for most beginners — it's cheaper, has a proven dual-band filter built in, and ZWO's imaging app is more polished for deep-sky work. The DWARF 3 wins if you want longer battery life, a brighter wide-angle camera for Milky Way shots, and don't mind spending more for the dual-camera versatility.
The smart telescope market has exploded, and two names come up constantly in beginner forums: the ZWO Seestar S30 and the DwarfLab DWARF 3. Both are compact, WiFi-connected scopes that do the heavy lifting for you — tracking, stacking, and processing all on-device. But they take different approaches, and the right pick depends entirely on what you want to photograph.
The Seestar S30 is ZWO's entry-level smart telescope, priced at $349 and designed primarily for deep-sky imaging. The DWARF 3 is DwarfLab's flagship at $499, featuring a dual-camera system (telephoto + wide-angle) and a massive 10-hour battery. Let's break down how they actually compare.
| Spec | ZWO Seestar S30 | DwarfLab DWARF 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $349 | $499 |
| Aperture | 30mm | 24mm |
| Focal Length | 90mm | 100mm |
| Focal Ratio | f/3 | f/4.2 |
| Main Sensor | Sony IMX662 | Sony IMX678 (8.4MP) |
| Resolution | 2.1 MP | 8.4 MP |
| Second Camera | None | Wide-angle (Milky Way) |
| Dual-Band Filter | Built-in (Ha/OIII) | No |
| Battery Life | ~6 hours | ~10 hours |
| Storage | 64GB internal | 128GB internal |
| Weight | 2.0 kg | 1.1 kg |
| Field of View | 1.5° × 0.8° | 2.2° × 1.7° |
| App (iOS/Android) | Seestar (polished) | DWARF Lab (improving) |
This is where it gets nuanced. The DWARF 3 has a higher-resolution 8.4MP Sony IMX678 sensor, which sounds like a win — but aperture matters most in astrophotography. More aperture = more light gathered = brighter, cleaner images faster. The Seestar S30's 30mm aperture vs. DWARF 3's 24mm gives Seestar a real edge for faint nebulae and galaxies.
The Seestar S30 also ships with a built-in dual-band narrowband filter (Hα/OIII), which cuts out light pollution and dramatically improves nebula contrast. Getting similar results from the DWARF 3 would require purchasing an external filter — which isn't straightforward with its form factor.
However, the DWARF 3's wide-angle camera is a genuine differentiator. It captures stunning Milky Way panoramas that the Seestar simply can't, making it a two-in-one device for both deep-sky and landscape astrophotography.
The DWARF 3 weighs just 1.1 kg — nearly half the Seestar S30's 2.0 kg. If you hike to dark sites or travel with your scope, that difference is meaningful. Both set up in under five minutes with no tools required and connect over WiFi to their respective apps.
The DWARF 3's 10-hour battery comfortably covers a full night in winter. The Seestar's 6-hour runtime is enough for most sessions but could leave you short on long nights without a power bank nearby.
ZWO's Seestar app is generally considered more refined. It has cleaner UI, faster plate-solving, and more reliable auto-focus. DwarfLab's app has improved significantly with firmware updates, but still receives occasional complaints about connectivity and stability. If you're a complete beginner who wants things to just work out of the box, the Seestar has a slight edge here.
ZWO Seestar S30
DwarfLab DWARF 3
If you've seen recommendations for the older DWARF II, it's still available at a reduced price (around $230–$280). It uses an older Sony IMX415 sensor and lacks the DWARF 3's improvements in build quality, battery, and sensor. At the current price gap, the DWARF 3 is worth the upgrade — but the DWARF II remains a solid entry-level option if you find it deeply discounted.
Disclosure: AstroCompare is reader-supported. We may earn an affiliate commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Prices shown are approximate and may vary — always verify on Amazon before purchasing.